Are Physicians Ethically Obligated to Address Hospice as an Alternative to “Usual” Treatment of Advancing End-Stage Disease?

Frederick A Smith

Abstract


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9209

Video

Hospice care is ideally suited to meet the psychosocial and spiritual needs of dying patients, providing the opportunity to settle financial, property and inheritance issues; to mend lacerations in important lifetime relationships, including forgiving and asking forgiveness; and to assure a degree of autonomous control over the environment and the social and spiritual processes that attend one’s death. Physicians are not only imprecise in prognosticating a patient’s time till death; they tend to be over-optimistic in their predictions. A “NO” answer to the question, “Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year?” is a reasonable starting-point for discussing Hospice care as a potential treatment plan, now or in the futureFor patients who are failing, with declining prospects for 1-year survival, physicians have a duty to present palliative care in Hospice as an alternative to the recurrent hospital interventions that are typical in the last 6 to 12 months of life.


Keywords


Palliative Care; Hospice; End-Stage Disease; Informed Consent

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9209




Islamic Medical Association of North America (IMANA) | JIMA and IMANA on Twitter

 

Creative Commons License
This work by Work's author(s) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.