Impact of the Peer Review Program on Hospitals and Physicians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5915/18-1-11731Keywords:
Prospective payment, Practice of Medicine, United StatesAbstract
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/18-1-11731 Prospective Paymem System DRGs are designed to limit the amount of payment to a hospital for any particular diagnosis, and the Peer Review Organizations are to police hospital activities. In every state, there is a PRO having a contract with the Health Care Financing Administration to perform the following junctions:(1) Review of reasonableness, necessity, and appropriateness of hospital admissions.
(2) Validation of diagnosis for determination of Medicare reimbursement.
(3) Review of completeness and quality of care provided.
(4) Review of completeness and appropriateness of outlier cases.
Getting a patient admitted to the hospital isn't as easy as it used to be, and it is going to become increasingly difficult. For a physician, it all adds up to another level of interference with which we haven't had to deal before.
The overall PRO program, including preadmission certification and the retrospective review process, is discussed in this article. The focus is on recommendations for physicians of "How to survive under the Prospective Payment System and the PRO program."
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).